The live snapshot of the Martin County CRA Performance Tracking & Intelligence Platform engagement, one shared picture of progress for the County team and BusinessFlare, without navigating the deeper project tools. The analytical dashboard is the data surface; this portal is the engagement view.
Explore each CRA in depth on the dashboard: parcel-level tax base density, use mix, FY26 stated goals, and the Mapp Road and Bridge Road case studies. Open the dashboard →
A draft CRA performance report is built: executive summary, the three-tiered framework, a full profile for each of the six districts, the corridor case studies, and recommendations. Finalizing as the remaining County data lands.
The dashboard now carries a chart on every district card, tax base growth, permit trend, vacancy trend, residential share, and top industries, plus cross-district comparison charts. Base maps, heat layers, tax-base graphics, and the economic impact model are done. Only the foot-traffic layer remains, gated on Placer.
The dashboard carries live data on every district tab: year-over-year tax base, CIP commitment, permit activity, employment, and commercial real estate. Deployed and cross-linked with this portal.
The one external dependency still holding a workstream. A short working session with Jordan and Dianne to choose which destinations within each CRA to track. Placer's polygon cap means we track points of interest, not whole districts.
Most County data is already in hand from the quarterly and annual reports: per-district permits, TIF revenue, CRA Investment Program completions, project lists, and engagement metrics. A short list of specific gaps remains.
Business outreach contacts; partnership agreements executed; certificates of occupancy issued; and the FY2025 CRA expenditure breakout by category. This is the workload-and-activity data the framework's top tier is built on.
A short session with Jordan and Dianne to select the destinations worth tracking in each CRA. Your local knowledge tells us which points of interest matter. This unlocks all six mobility metrics at once.
The Jensen Beach parcel set runs about 16% under the Annual Report figure, now traced to a boundary-extent difference (roughly 57.5 GIS acres vs about 65 reported), likely waterfront or riparian parcels from the 2021 boundary redraw. Confirming the current boundary with Dianne clears the one validation flag in the dataset.
Work we own and are actively pulling. It does not wait on the County.
Business count, employment, and industry mix are in from Esri Business Analyst, enriched against each CRA boundary. Average earnings and net business openings are the remaining pieces, pending a second Business Analyst and Lightcast pull.
Interest rates, Florida construction value, the insurance-market signal, county population and income are pulled and sourced. A Treasure Coast market-level absorption trend (distinct from the per-district net absorption already live on the dashboard), a full permit-level developer scan, and two districts' flood-zone acreage are the remaining pieces.
Just value, taxable value, and tangible personal property per CRA are pulled from the tax roll and DOR assessment roll and joined to each boundary, validated to the Annual Report within 1.6% for five of six districts.
Median sale price and turnover are computed per CRA from qualified arm's-length sales joined to each district boundary, alongside the commercial real estate metrics in the framework.
Phase 5 draft shared with Jordan, Susan, and Dianne: per-district profiles, the Mapp Road and Bridge Road case studies, and recommendations.
Phase 6 executive deck and final dashboard. Board walkthrough with the County team before the public presentation.
Final report, dashboard, and executive deck delivered to Martin County, closing Phases 5 and 6.
Parcel-to-CRA spatial join (97,297 parcels, 7,435 inside CRAs), validated to the Annual Report within 1.6% for five of six districts. CoStar commercial, Esri employment, CIP, permits, and year-over-year tax base all acquired.
Comparative analysis, typology validation, fiscal analysis, commercial and residential real estate, the Mapp Road and Bridge Road case studies, and a first-pass economic impact model, backed by the framework workbook.
County investment versus private investment triggered, on real parcel-roll data with the County's official project dates, delivered for the budget workshop.
A full draft report (executive summary, framework, six district profiles, corridor case studies, recommendations) and a board presentation deck, both built from the completed analysis and updating as County data lands.
Two-page deployment: this status portal plus the analytical dashboard with live data on every district tab. Cross-linked, hosted, and updated as the analysis advances.
Jensen Beach variance diagnosed as a boundary-extent issue, not a valuation error: the parcel join runs on about 57.5 GIS acres against roughly 65 reported, with the difference in waterfront or riparian parcels from the 2021 redraw. Pending County boundary confirmation.
CRA typology framework adopted as a working hypothesis: Mature Residential (Golden Gate), Compact Commercial Downtown (Jensen Beach), Mixed-Use Corridor (Old Palm City, Hobe Sound), Heterogeneous Infrastructure (Port Salerno, Rio). Five of six validate against the data; Rio is under peer review.
Foot traffic methodology will be destination-level, not district-level. Placer's polygon cap means we track specific points of interest within each CRA, selected jointly with the County team.
Five of six CRAs validate to the Annual Report within 1.6%. Jensen Beach carries the boundary gap noted above, still open with the County.